Reply to RBG Politcal Discussion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "RBG Politcal Discussion"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So Murkowski and Collins are already out in favor do waiting.  We need 3 people out this way to wait.

My sad prognosis is that these two rushing up front were doing so so they don’t have to be number 3. No one will be number 3. Such a sad shame. Could the historians in the room share some perspective?  I’m just an engineer. [/quote]

There needs to be 4. With only 3 Pence would break a tie. I wouldn't hold my breath.[/quote]

What’s wrong with everyone doing their job and replacing the deceased SCOTUS justice? That’s their job. 
Chips of death fall where they fall.
[/quote]

So put Merrick Garland on the court as he should be.[/quote]
Exactly.  If they wanted a truce, that's what they would do.  The fact that js not even a consideration is the problem.[/quote]

Isn’t Metrick a woman? We need a woman or PoC. [/quote]
Like I said, if they wanted a truce, they know what to do.[/quote]

Lol.  A truce?  Politics is war by other means.  McConnell isn't dumb enough to believe there's ever going to be any sort of truce.[/quote]
You know exactly what I mean, so don't pretend you don't and that McConnell isn't making deliberate choices knowing what the consequences of each path are.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics