Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "J.K. Rowling’s post on trans-identity and modern misogyny"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]51 pages in, I still don't understand the central argument of this debate. If the question is, are trans women the same as cis women? The answer is, yes trans women can identify as women (or anything else they want to) because gender is an identity. At the same time trans women are obviously not the same as cis women biologically, just look at the difference in sex chromosomes. To sum up, trans women are males (biologically) who identify as female (as a social gender). Trans women share some similarities as cis women but since they are also different biologically, trans women =/= cis women. This seems pretty simple. [/quote] I had to read your post several times because at first you say yes, trans women can identify as women, then at the end you say transwomen are not women. I don't quite buy the argument that gender is an identity insomuch as it is, first and foremost, a biology. That is the basis of the gender. The social construct argument wants to weaken this basis, but it is a very powerful basis that can't be ignored. See the rubbish earlier about menstruating as someone tries to circumvent basic science. Things would be much simpler if transwomen accepted they are not women but transwomen and that the extreme advocates among them accept there are places they may not be able to use because they are reserved for biological women (women's sports, for example). They should make their peace with it. The reason the debate has become so polarizing is because trans activists have turned it into an all but nothing cause. It also doesn't help that the angry activists tried to deplatform and cancel JK Rowling, who is otherwise sympathetic to those who feel the need to live as the opposite gender, for simply pointing out the basic reality of the science, which is why the trans activists are very much a case of emperor's new clothing. [/quote] Cis women and trans women are the same gender (social). However, cis women and trans women are not the same sex (biological). In other words, both cis women and trans women are women but only cis women are female. Acknowledging this reality does not conflict with trans rights. [/quote] This is not reality [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics