Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Who did you think killed JonBenet?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The media and police crucified the Ramseys. The only thing that made them even possible suspects was that JB was found in their house. But that in itself also points to an intruder. Reasons the police gave were: They were rich and hired an attorney. They did this because they realized within a few days that the cops were incompetent. The police said they could tell by looking at them. It was not just the female detective that did this. The male cop said when they were in the house on 12/26 and Patsy was sitting down at one point she had her hands over her face and then she looked at the cops through her "splayed fingers". Patsy was in shock and because she looked at the cops while having her hands over her face made them think she was guilty. Crazy. The sweater being worn twice. (normal behavior). Bed wetting (normal). The pageants (not common in Boulder but very common in the South and what Patsy grew up with) Also the press made it seem that JB's life was nothing but pageants. Not true. She did a few a year. The rest of the time she did all normal kid activities. The ransom note. They insisted Patsy could not be ruled out. Well the truth is most people on the planet could not be truly ruled out if you went by handwriting alone. So a crazy person breaks into your house and decides to write a ransom note. Obviously they will try to disguise their writing. Now the cops want to match hand writing samples to disguised writing. Ridiculous and impossible. I could sit down with a pen and paper and write that note in twenty different ways. They ruled out all other people on their list by hair, blood, and handwriting samples. And lame alibis. Well if the killer did not bleed then he would not leave blood. If he wore gloves and a ski mask he would not leave fingerprints or hair. If he did not spit, sneeze, cough, or ejaculate, he would not leave dna. They really had no evidence that was not botched. They also said that the ransom note was written by Patsy to cover up her crazy assault on her daughter. They couldy not belive an intruder would break in and start with a ransom note and then turn the crime into a murder and sexual assault. Look at other crimes. How about the family in Connecticut that was killed in their home. Two men saw what they though was a rich woman and followed her home. They came back to the house later that night and broke in. They held the two daughters and dad hostage while they took the mom to the bank. Then they decided money was not enough so they sexually assaulted them and murdered them and tried to burn the house down. Was the motive money, sexual perversion, or just being a crazy person. The Ramseys were normal people. But they were not normal to local cops. The press just ran with the Ramseys did it theory and ruined their lives. The Ramseys faced hardships that most people have never encountered. One daughter died in a car accident. Patsy battled ovarian cancer for a year with horrible chemo. Their young daughter is murdered and assaulted in their home on Christmas Day. They are hounded forever by the police and press. Patsy battles cancer again and dies. That family deserves for someone to find the truth for all the pain and suffering they went through.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics