Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers
Reply to "Free-range kids picked up AGAIN by police"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] The implicit threat with CPS is always that they will remove the kids. If you think that CPS would not remove the kids over this, that's good news.[/quote] Uh, no. The implicit threat with CPS was they had to sign something saying they wouldn't do it again. CPS isn't going to remove the kids unless they think the kids' welfare is in danger. That may happen, but not because they want to prove a point.[/quote] They had to sign something saying they wouldn't do it again, [i]or else [/i]-- right? Otherwise it's not a threat. And if the "or else" isn't that CPS will remove the kids, what is it?[/quote] Yes, I guess that's the implicit threat. That's also the implicit threat of what will happen if I physically abuse my kids. I think I'm okay with that.[/quote] So you think walking home from the park is so dangerous that the kids would be better off in foster care?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
