Reply to How likely for save act to pass senate?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How likely for save act to pass senate? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Supreme Court ruled this week that the USPS can decide not to deliver mail to people without recourse. So if the leadership decide not to deliver mail in ballots because people are black or democrats, it is totally legal.

But sure, let's limit people's ability to vote because they got married and changed their name.[/quote]

1. Pretty sure that if they don't deliver ballots, there are other laws that would apply.
[b]2. Quit claiming that married women will not be able to vote.  That is a bogus accusation and it is getting tiresome.[/b]

For some reason, it would appear that you do not want any limits on who can vote--i.e. you do not want people to prove their citizenship.[/quote]

There is not one sentence in the law affirming a marriage certificate as adequate to prove a change name of a US citizen. Not bogus.[/quote]

PROCESS IN CASE OF CERTAIN DISCREPANCIES IN DOCUMENTATION.—[b]Subject to any relevant guidance adopted by the Election Assistance Commission[/b], each State shall establish a process under which an applicant can provide such [b]additional documentation t[/b]o the appropriate election official of the State as may be necessary to establish that the applicant is a citizen of the United States in the event of a discrepancy with respect to the applicant’s documentary proof of United States citizenship[/quote]

The first bolded makes the second irrelevant. Marriage certificate does bupkis unless a board that doesn’t currently exist eventually says it does. Zero protection for married women who changed their names.[/quote]

LOL!  You really think they are going to disenfranchise married women?  Why would they want to do that?[/quote]
Unfortunately, it is married women with MAGA husbands that vote who hubby vote for on Election Day. Single women are more independent in thought as they make their voting selections. This will hurt maga married women most. [/quote]

You have a low estimate of women.  You really think GOP women vote like their husbands tell them?

I was an Election Officer.

The only person I ever saw who did this was a couple with the woman in ethnic garb from the Middle East.  The husband insisted he needed to stay with his wife to show her how to vote.  This was before MAGA and I seriously doubt he was voting GOP.  I had to get the Chief Election Officer (a man) to tell him that this was not allowed in the polling place.
This is one more reason to insist on in-person voting over mail-in voting.  The old way with Absentee Ballots being only for valid reasons needs to come back.[/quote]
It’s a secret ballot. How could you possibly know who people voted for?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics