Reply to The DMV needs a YIMBY revolution

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "The DMV needs a YIMBY revolution "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Unironically. 
Most of you will hate this but I don’t care. We all need to suck it up and move into the 21st century, 25 years too late.

No more tweaking around the edges with low-level zoning reform or a few more metro stops or buses here and there. We need a broad scale systematic urban planning overhaul that completely eliminates single family zoning anywhere inside the Beltway.

Single family zoning is simply unsustainable. We can’t grow our economy if we don’t have new residents and we can’t have new residents if we don’t have homes. And if we don’t have more homes near better, reliable transit, then everyone will be more miserable stuck in traffic and less productive at work and less economically competitive. We need to completely eliminate suburban sprawl. The 1950s planned communities need to stay in the past. In a perfect world we’d move everyone closer in to promote re-wilding of our exurbs.

Nobody should be living in a single family suburban home and drive an SUV. It should be either urban, dense multi family dwelling walkable 15-minute neighborhoods, or rural homesteads, preferably using their land for organic family farming and solar fields and green spaces.

If it weren’t for American “but muh freedumb!” selfish ideology, I guarantee we would all have a much higher quality of life with less traffic, less stress, stronger communities, less obesity, and a better economy.

Bring on the YIMBY revolution. [/quote]

DC GDP:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCNGSP

Seems historically robust and growing. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Increased urbanization has lots of downside: fewer greener spaces, pollution, increased crime (not a fear, but rather a fact), waste disposal problems and god forbid if we have another pandemic. A dense, urban space spreads disease faster.

[/quote]

Urbanization allows for more green space and lowers pollution.[/quote]

It can, but it can also make it worse.  You’d have to have a pretty comprehensive plan to see if that pencils out, but you don’t.[/quote]

You can spread people out or put them together. The latter leaves more space for green and lower transportation and other pollution.[/quote]

You are just saying wishful words, which seems typical.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-021-00026-w

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2024-01-29-expert-comment-urbanisation-s-role-climate-crisis-being-overlooked

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278265[/quote]

Sounds like degrotg. Anyhoo, one of tour links said "If humanity continues to build cities in the same way we have over the past century — [b]low density,[/b] energy and material intensive — more raw materials will be required than the planet can sustainably provide."

Like I said:You can spread people out or put them together. The latter leaves more space for green and lower transportation and other pollution.
[/quote]

I said I would never look here again but I saw some stuff on X I couldn’t let stand.

1) this whole board is anonymous.  Please remember that the moderator has admitted he has evidence that  people make inaccurate representations of who they are.

2) saying that, I have no interest in  direct attacks from any side.

3) impact study issues make a difference in my daily life. They need to figure out sewer in the front end (I know of 4 homes in my neighborhood that had sewer issue, 3 associated with building increases that would be larger if more families lived on a property.  I hope you would want sewer to be sorted on the front end (and know who siping for it) if you are building any type of housing. No one in a condo or SFH wants their toilets backing up. I could go on about schools, water management, and trees.

5) I hope those in favor of increased density will recognize there are some compelling real life arguments to be figured out before building that deserve consideration and are exactly the responsibility of good local government. Without actual studies of impacts on neighborhoods being rezoned, there is very little chance we will get this right.

6) debate on the merits of a theoretical argument are good for the political process at higher levels.  But local government should be making sure that kids have a desk in their classroom and we aren’t flooding our neighbors.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics