Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Virginia Union was SYC and McLean. Now that SYC is leaving, is it possible that Virginia Union couldn’t continue without a partner?[/quote] McLean could have added DMV FC and GFR[/quote] Just let BRAVE fail, the top girls were trying out with Union every year anyways. They'd be on the team already if they were good enough. McLean should have partnered with FCV, who was/is still desperate for ECNL, maybe BP would have stayed? Probably not, way too many egos for that to go down, but interesting thougt excercise. Doesn't it make more sense then an alliance with a county that you are already thrive in with two clubs that are failing to produce at the ECNL level. You could have owned Leesburg Pike and become LPA, or just stick wtih FCV, that brand people know nationally better than McLean or Union or FVU, that V is critical[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
