Reply to Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am as anti trump as they come.  I think the SC should reinstate Trump on the ballot.

I know that he formented an insurrection against the US.  We all saw it.  But I think before we can invoke the constitutional escape hatch, he must be convincted of this crime.

Let’s beat him at the ballot box.  [/quote]
If the 14th amendment doesn’t cite criminal conviction as a prerequisite for precluding someone from holding office, why do you think conviction is a must?[/quote]

DP.
Some people are labeling J6 as an insurrection.  Others are labeling it as a protest that turned into a riot.  So, one man's insurrection is another man's riot.  Without a conviction, what occurred on J6 is defined by individuals and the way they perceived it.  
And, it is interesting that not one person has been even charged with "insurrection."[/quote]

A conviction has never been needed before now. Why should Trump get special treatment?

Also, Colorado went to great lengths to find an appropriate definition for “insurrection,” and weighed the evidence. You can read it for yourself to get the answers you seek. [/quote]

Colorado also permitted hearsay evidence, which is not allowed in a trial. 
There was NO TRIAL for "insurrection."  Because nobody has been charged with it.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics