Reply to BASIS DC will seek to expand to include K to 4th grade

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "BASIS DC will seek to expand to include K to 4th grade"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If Ludlow-Taylor can produce kids who do well at BASIS, then BASIS elementary should be able to do the same thing with the same demographics, right?  So all BASIS has to do is use the at-risk preference to mimic Ludlow-Taylor's setup. Easy peasy![/quote]

It is actually easier than that. BASIS will get kids in K+ and be able to teach them how to study and instill executive functioning well before 5th. [/quote]

And Ludlow-Taylor was recently 17% at-risk and 14% students with disabilities. So BASIS can aim for 17% at-risk, through the preference. That's higher than the 8% at BASIS right now, but if it works for Ludlow-Taylor then why shouldn't it work for BASIS? Amirite?

https://stossepublicdocsprod.blob.core.windows.net/public-docs/dc-school-report-card/2021-22/profiles/001-0271(Ludlow-Taylor%20Elementary%20School).pdf

https://stossepublicdocsprod.blob.core.windows.net/public-docs/dc-school-report-card/2021-22/profiles/168-3068(BASIS%20DC%20PCS).pdf[/quote]

What are you talking about? [/quote]

I'm talking about how people are saying (I think) that BASIS middle school won't do well if BASIS operates an elementary school, because the kids moving from BASIS 4th grade to BASIS 5th grade will be demographically different and therefore not as academically advanced. I think that's what they're saying, anyway. But if Ludlow-Taylor can successfully prepare kids for BASIS despite some of them being at-risk, then can't BASIS also prepare kids for BASIS with a similar at-risk percentage?[/quote]

Would love for BASIS ES to have similar results. It’s great to see LT on an upward trajectory, which I hear is in part contributed to the buy-in of more IB families and support through the PTO. This, along with DCPS funding and resources have helped ensure the proportion of students needing coaching and supports does not exceed available resources at LT. Some of the former HRCS were in similar positions but as the proportion of kids exceeded the available resources, those schools went into the downward spirals. The demographics is not the issue, it’s ensuring that there are adequate supports. 
[/quote]

Right, so, the Uniform Per-Student Funding Formula provides extra funding for each student with an IEP.

If you think special needs doesn't correlate with demographics, I don't know what to tell ya.[/quote]

I’m trying to follow. I’m referring to charters operating on 80% of what DCPS receives, fundraising that goes to more than just teacher bonuses, and a school that appears to collaborate with parents through the PTO.
[/quote]

Cite for that 80% figure? I don't even know what your point is right now. Schools and PTOs can decide how to spend their fundraising.[/quote]

This was a misunderstanding on my part. I had heard for years that charters received less funding than regular DCPS or maybe that was just in reference to the teacher salaries since they aren’t part of WTU. Thanks to your prompt I am now up to speed on the equal funding received from the city. Great to know and eliminates that concern.

I wouldn’t downplay the role an active PTO plays in school success though. I could be misinformed on this topic as well, but I thought the BASIS model doesn’t support that. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics