Reply to Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pence knew

https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1177994106636832768[/quote]

I'm beginning to think that liberals don't respect the Constitution at all. Sounds like they want to overthrow the electoral college and put a Democrat in office.[/quote]

Impeach != overthrow. And impeachment is in the Constitution.
[/quote]

[b]When you announce an impeachment BEFORE you know the actual facts[/b], then yes, it's it's overthrowing.

Impeachment is very specifically defined in the constitution.

Do you honestly know how bad it will look to mainstream America if you manage to throw Trump and Pence out of office and Pelosi becomes President? You probably don't because you live in the DC bubble. Probably are a Fed or a contractor.[/quote]

I honestly can't tell -- don't you know the difference between an "impeachment" and an "impeachment inquiry?" [/quote]

(still interested in an answer for this)[/quote]

I absolutely do. Why announce an inquiry before you have the transcript of the call? Why tweet about a whistleblower complaint end of August that comes to fruition end of September (hint, Schiff already knew). And why not read the transcript as is to the American people instead of creating what Schiff now calls a 'parody'.

I don't think they expected a transcript.[/quote]

Trump admitted to a crime before we even saw the transcript. And people - including Adam Schiff and the rest of Congress - knew that the aid to Ukraine had been held up the White House with no explanation.
Add to that the Acting DNI refusing to turn the whistleblower's complaint over to Congress. It doesn't take a genius to put 2 and 2 and 2 together.

Remember, at the time the impeachment inquiry was announced, they still hadn't agreed to turn over the whistleblower's complaint. Or the phone call. Pelosi outmanouvered them.[/quote]

Nope, no such admission. I know that's the narrative though. And Ukraine didn't know the aid was held up.  (https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/27/ukraine-government-trump-aid-freeze-phone-call/)

Schiff was tweeting about the whisleblower's complaint in August. He already had it.[/quote]

Yes, Trump did admit it before Pelosi's announcement. https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-napolitano-trump-admitted-crime[/quote]

Your source says "effectively" and Napolitano "had framed".

These are opinions.[/quote]

And a majority of Congressional Democrats shared that opinion. The whistleblower shared that opinion. The ICIG shared that opinion. The Acting DNI shared that opinion.

Guess what? That's enough to open an impeachment INQUIRY, which they wanted to do ASAP so evidence would be preserved. [/quote]

"Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma."  Nothing to see here .....

[i]"Burisma’s American lawyers contacted the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case.

Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) since the summer of 2018, fearing it might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws. First, they hired a former federal prosecutor to bring the information to the U.S. attorney in New York, who, they say, showed no interest. Then, the Ukrainians reached out to President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani."
[/i]

[i]Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.

After I first reported it in a column, [b]the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting[/b].[/i]

We've heard all about that on DCUM. Problem is, the bolded above

You really should read the article I'm linking. But I'm sure you will stick your nose up and sneer "Solomon" instead:

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story#.XY02ewYDEV8.twitter

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics