Reply to There are No Successful Black Nations - Foreign Policy Mag, written by a black writer

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "There are No Successful Black Nations - Foreign Policy Mag, written by a black writer"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]South Africa has issues but could hardly be described as unsuccessful. [/quote]

Yes, I wonder what was different about South Africa...[/quote]

Perhaps people like Nelson Mandela and Desmond Tutu plus quantities old gold and diamonds that weren't completely depleted by colonial powers.[/quote]

Most african nations were depleted and then left in a state of poor agriculture, no infrastructure, and no industry, i.e. no functioning economy.  The better off black nations transitioned to states with functioning economies.[/quote]

So then what happened with Zimbabwe? When the British pulled out it was producing so much agriculture it was called Africa's breadbasket. Under Mugabe, farming has all but stopped and now the citizens are starving.

You can't blame EVERYTHING on white people.[/quote]
Unfortunately, a crazy madman took over.  When you have a population that was not allowed to thrive, left uneducated and poor, you get a crazy person who can easily take over.

Korea had a huge uneducated population prior to 80's maybe even 90's. It was largely agricultural prior to the 60's.  Japan colonized Korea for over 30y rs.   The only reason S. Korea was able to thritve was because 1. it had a lot of financial help from the US  after the country was decimated 2. it had a military rule for a long time, and the continued backing of the US military such that there was no way a crazy person was going to be able to take over. Before the late 80's/early 90's, that country was not doing so well.

Look at N. Korea.  It was left to fend for itself, and look what happened?  You got a crazy leader (more like, family) and a largely uneducated population. I'm not saying all poor, former colonies end up with crazy leaders, obviously.  But, I think such countries are easy pickings for crazy leaders to take over.  Many countries have been fortunate enough to escape that end, but unfortunately, others haven't.

Similar things have happened in Eastern Europe, btw.  Hungary was one such example.  Though we don't call it "colonized", I think being part of the USSR is kind of like colonialism.[/quote]

Reason #3 why South Korea was able to thrive; the average Korean has an IQ of 105.[/quote]

Is the difference between the economies of North Korea and South Korea due to the IQs of their populations, or might there be factors much more important than racial/ethnic average IQ in the economic development of nations? If the US and other developed nations stopped trading with South Korea, would their IQs drop, or just their GDP?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics