Reply to OJ: Made in America (ESPN Doc)

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "OJ: Made in America (ESPN Doc)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honestly, every time a white person erupts in hysterics over the outcome of the OJ trial, I know I am dealing with:

(1) a person too stupid to understand what "beyond reasonable doubt" means.

(2) an idiotic racist who thinks white lives are more important than all other lives. If you are not similarly disturbed and aggrieved by the [I]thousands[/I] of unavenged black deaths in the time since the OJ trial, feel free to take a flying leap off the nearest bridge.[/quote]

I don't understand this. The evidence proved that he did it beyond reasonable doubt. How do you have his blood, Nicole's blood, and Ron's blood at HER house, in HIS car, and at HIS house if he didn't do it? And no one else's blood in ANY of those locations?* What other reasonable scenario is there? And don't say they cops framed him because they didn't have any of OJ's blood to plant in those locations when they were established as crime scenes. If anyone in your life was murdered, you would absolutely accept that much evidence as proof of guilt. Anybody would.

*Plus hairs and clothing fibers from all three people, OJ's gloves at two locations, shoe prints established to be from shoes he owned, etc etc. Not even getting into the multiple eyewitnesses who saw his car in both locations, etc. Just the literal physical evidence at three locations (two houses and the car) that the defense did NOT get thrown out. [/quote]

When one of the detectives is asked directly if he planted evidence and takes the Fifth, even damning evidence doesn't do much damning anymore.[/quote]

That was[b] brilliant lawyering[/b]...but it doesn't change who the killer was.[/quote]

Yes, which adds to the nuggets of reasonable doubt. So, no they didn't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt legally. Don't forget that DNA evidence at that time was still not ingrained in ordinary people's minds the way it is now post-CSI, etc. Of course we all know who did it, but the prosecution didn't get it over the threshold of "no reasonable doubt."[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics