Reply to Rape Victim: Hilary put me through Hell

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Rape Victim: Hilary put me through Hell"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Here is the audio. Lovely. I like when she laughs about the lie detector test. Also gotta love the fake accent. She obviously thinks this whole thing is funny. That poor child.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/audio-hillary-clinton-speaks-of-defense-of-child-rapist-in-newly-unearthed-tapes/[/quote]

I just listened to that entire recording. Clinton was able to get the case plea bargained because the State mishandled the evidence. Based on what is on the tape, the State threw away the evidence. I'm obviously not a lawyer, but I think Clinton herself would be subject to malpractice charges if she hadn't pursued that in defense of her client. 
[/quote]

That is a different point. I am not criticizing a defense attorney for doing her job. It is her skewering of the young girl and her gleeful remarks. This is the antithesis of feminism. [/quote]

There was no evidence of Clinton "skewering" the girl on the tape. What did I miss?
[/quote]

It is in the affidavit.[/quote]

NP here. Wasn't the information in the affidavit based upon the investigation and opinion(s) from one of the experts, though? Not sure how a defense attorney raising those issues in an affidavit filed in the case is "skewering" anybody. [/quote]

Yes, this is exactly right. Clinton simply reported the findings of an expert. Moreover, none of that even made it into court. So, at best, Clinton could be accused of considering skewering a 12-year old, though I would still argue that reporting the findings of an expert is not "skewering". Nevertheless, the skewering never took place.
[/quote]

+1. The articles clearly says that the victim does not even  remember ever meeting Clinton at the time.  Based on the article, Clinton was appointed by the court and did not seek this client, had the client take a polygraph, sought the opinion of a leading DNA expert (Nobel prize winning no less).  I am not sure how this amount to "destroying the victim" and denying her justice. based on the article, justice was denied by the prosecutor, who lost the key piece of evidence.  while the victim does not remember Clinton, she does remember how she was treated by law enforcement and the prosecution.  She was denied justice and abused by the system then and she is being exploited now by whoever is trying to give legs to this story to hurt Clinton (of whom I am no fan).  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics