Reply to Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^ Blame the Obama administration for lying in the first place and continuing that lie with the families of the fallen.  [/quote]

Non sequitur.  All that happened was confused messaging during the fog of war, not overt, intentional lying (and to date there has been zero evidence of overt, intentional lying).

It is not at all a reasonable response to then take the next two years diverting Congress away from important work that needs to be done, to waste millions of dollars on pointless, useless, fruitless investigations, and to have this dominate the 24 hour news cycle in conservative media for TWO FUCKING YEARS STRAIGHT.

This was from the start, and still is, nothing but a witch hunt and manufactured outrage with zero real goal other than to drive divisive partisanship.[/quote]

There were no “confused messages” due to “the fog of war.” 
There were lies and more lies to cover up the first lies.  
The American public was lied to as were the families of the fallen.
You all have drunk the Kool aid.  
And, the Republicans do not need to drive divisive partisanship.  Obama does that quite well on his own.  [/quote]

We were lied to about Iraq.  And that cost hundreds of thousands of lives and put us 4 trillion dollars in debt.  Where was our outrage then?[/quote]

Enough of the lying bs. WJC believed they had WMD's. The intel said he had them. For it to be lying you have to have reports that say one thing and you say another. And by pushing this lying thing you make everyone, including those on the intel committees, look like total idiots or at the very least incompetent buffoons.[/quote]

The people who "believed" did so because they had no idea that the diagrams of "mobile bioweapons labs" that Colin Powell showed in Congress, and the little vials of white powder that he held up, were completely fake.  They had no idea that the supposed "yellowcake uranium from Niger" was fake.  A lot of people believed because the lie had not yet been exposed.[/quote]

You're ignoring the facts and repeating partisan crap. Among other things Colin Powell went before the United Nations, not Congress. And your still ignoring WJC's intimate knowledge. If this was all fake against the intel...WJC's could have stood up and said...BS...but he didnt'.

Ya know what I find funny...Saddam WANTED the world to believe he had those weapons. In part because he feared Iran and believed that was a deterrent keeping them at bay. Ever read his interviews? How about things he said and did during the 90's.

Well, Saddam claimed he was packing but when his pants were pulled down it was a rolled up sock.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics