Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Gay "marriage" supporters - what is your endgame?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I love that OP is airing her opinions so freely. Keep going, OP. The more you talk, the more you mobilize all the sane people who don't want to live in a theocracy. Please, tell us more![/quote] Sure!! Have Hillary run on forcing Christians to bake gay wedding cakes ! Can't wait .[/quote] Under the equal rights theories, your second grade home room teacher can be a man who wears a dress, heels and a wig.[/quote] Okay let's get started shall we? This class is a wonderful example of the first tactic on the list of Schopenhauer's 38 Stratagems. In 1831 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) published a book entitled [u]The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument [/u]. It is an acidulous and sarcastic treatise in which Schopenhauer examines a total of thirty-eight methods of showing up one's opponent in a debate. As I referenced earlier, the argument by the PP is a beautiful example of the number one tactic on Schopenhauer's list... [i]1. Carry your opponent's proposition beyond its natural limits; exaggerate it. The more general your opponent's statement becomes, the more objections you can find against it. The more restricted and narrow his or her propositions remain, the easier they are to defend by him or her.[/i] Wonderful example PP. Not sure if you were being stubborn and obtuse in that statement or just plain paranoid and have a habit of outrageous hyperbolism. In any case, again...great example PP.[/quote] Nice citation - thanks but Insofar as a bunch of folks have endorsed this very scenario in response to my post, I would say the example has actually been helpful to show just how far the gay "marriage" crowd is ready to roll with this.[/quote] Indiana is roughly 80% Christian, so whom exactly is this law protecting? What religion is being “restored”? Practitioners of Christianity in Indiana are not in jeopardy of losing their right to worship or practice their faith which means the only reason to pass such a law is to allow people to extend the practice of their faith to include discriminating against those who don’t share their values. That’s the kind of thinking that drove Christians out of Europe to found this country in the first place. Couple questions for you... Just how far are you ready to roll in response to the gay marriage crowd OP? To what extent are you and all those who oppose gay marriage willing to go to ensure that your religious beliefs are not infringed upon by [i]them[/i]? What other laws are you prepared to put in place to protect yourself from [i]them[/i]? Lastly, are you seeking any therapy for your obvious paranoia issues concerning [i]them[/i]?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics