Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Health and Medicine
Reply to "Interesting research on the over diagnosis of breast 'cancer' due to mammograms"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PP, just saw this link to a TED talk on one of my facebook friends page--many women in her family have died of breast cancer and it's a topic that concerns her deeply. I was fascinated: http://www.ted.com/talks/deborah_rhodes "Working with a team of physicists, Dr. Deborah Rhodes developed a new tool for tumor detection that's 3 times as effective as traditional mammograms for women with dense breast tissue. The life-saving implications are stunning. So why haven't we heard of it? Rhodes shares the story behind the tool's creation, and the web of politics and economics that keep it from mainstream use."[/quote] The problem with the TED talk is we've since found out that breast density is not a big as risk factor as once thought. Consider the timing of breast density 'news' with new laws that the states and feds are passing/trying to get passed. In fact, the death rate from breast cancer is higher for women with fatty breasts, and further imaging just for dense breasts is leading to too many false positives and unnecessary biopsies - and worry. I, for one, am sick of the medical community, politicians and politicians turning my body into nothing but a ticking time bomb. That's no way to enjoy life. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics