Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "So, what is wrong with Hardy?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]@ 1525: the last few comments about social insecurity and IB parents' reticence to send their kids to Hardy deserve to be in the conversation about "what is wrong with Hardy." Ironically, the best practical answer here is that there's NOTHING wrong with Hardy; rather, it is the frail self-image of social climbing parents that taints Ward 3's ability to have a fair conversation about the place.[/quote] How about its 55% FARMs rate: [quote]Research establishes that most successful schools are those in which the middle class is the majority. Success starts turning to failure, it is generally agreed, when the school becomes 50% minority or low income. See All Together Now at 39. The Prospects studies found that when half a student body is poor, then all students' achievement will be depressed, and that when 75% is poor, then all students' achievement will be "seriously" depressed. Prospects II at 12. Another expert has concluded that a district with over 60% poor children "can no longer rely solely on its own internal efforts" to avoid failure. Concentration of Poverty at 133. By comparison, RCSD's 90% poverty configuration puts it well beyond even these ominous figures, into a level identified as "extreme poverty." Id. at 134.9[/quote] http://www.prrac.org/pdf/annotated_bibliography_on...hool_poverty_concentration.pdf [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics