Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "All Kids Are Gifted, a Sports Metaphor"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Actually, schools do not differentiate the kid in the 30% from the kid in the 80%. Also, it is shown there is a sweet spot for intelligence. The top being not so great but being right below that and having other intelligences like having a High EIQ being more valuable. Still you continuously equate school success with life success and they are not related. A B student is not less likely to be successful than an A+ student. [/quote] You're comparing high 90% with high 80% which isn't really that statistically significant in the grand scheme of things. A B student isn't average, he's above average. I thought we were talking about comparing the high-performing kids to the average kids, but you seem to be sliding away from that. Compared to the kid who gets a lot of C's and D's the kid with a high B average is likely to do better, and will be more likely to go to college. But the kid with the high B average also would be less likely to be the one to get a full scholarship or admission to one of the better schools than the one with more A's. [/quote] No we are talking about GT vs. not GT, 80% is not GT. I agree a 80% kid and a GT kid (the way it is measured now) are not significantly different. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics