Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to " no texting and driving commercial with permanently disabled child"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I think the problem is that people are assuming that the OP is the same poster as the one(s) who later on in the thread called the mother *degenerate* and gone on to blame her and assume it was her poor parenting that was at fault here. Valetta Bradford (that's her name btw) is NOT a degenerate. She's not a bad mother. Xzavier was doing everything right: he was crossing in the crosswalk, holding his 13 year old sisters hand (not playing in the street as other PPs who can't be bothered to find anything out about this case have just assumed). And still he was hit by a young woman who was too busy texting to pay attention. I think all the PPs who made these assumptions saw a woman who was black and overweight with a child who's name is spelled in a nontraditional manner and decided that it was ok to blame the victim. If they'd actually watched the documentary the commercial was cut from, or hell even this short from the DOT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oymnC-tM79o You'll hear that this wasn't the first time the girl who hit Xzavier was texting and driving, and Xzavier told his mother *I did everything you told me to. She was bad.*[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics