Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "SWS - as an IB School? L-T prospects?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ludlow-Taylor is 21 percent in-boundary, JO Wilson is 35 percent. Miner - 34 percent in-boundary, Tyler is 26 percent. It's hard to argue that the Hill needs another school.[/quote] Since SWS is basically all Hill kids now because of the old IB cluster preference and the current sibling preference, is it really an issue of adding another Hill school? It may be only a semantic difference, but would keeping SWS local really change the IB numbers at the other Hill schools since it is Hill kids already? [/quote] SWS is expanding all the way up to 5th grade, so there will be quite a few new seats overall. This year it added PS-3. Neighborhood proximity would effectively create a new Hill school. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
