Reply to Size & placement of regional magnet programs set to decimate non-host, non-rich schools

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Size & placement of regional magnet programs set to decimate non-host, non-rich schools"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why would any parent send their kids to a watered down “magnet”.  Won’t happen. Look at what they tried to do the IB programs at Watkins mill and Kennedy.  [/quote]

They'll go if the host school offers better opportunities than the home school and they can swing the commute.

We are zoned for Einstein. I have hope that Einstein will be a good place for my DC, especially since it will be a relatively smaller school. DC is pretty average academically and will probably be well served with standard MCPS courses available at every high school. But BCC and Blair definitely offer a wider variety of courses, and there are public buses to both of these schools with stops near our home. Whitman would probably be too difficult, nor is it the environment I'd want for DC especially away from all their friends.[/quote]

For kids who don't want STEM, Einstein is perfect.[/quote]

I really hate for this rumor to get traction. My Einstein grad is in college for engineering, his good friend who also graduated from Einstein is studying chemistry in college, and a third friend is majoring in physics at UMD. This is flat-out incorrect, apparently driven by that one poster who is annoyed that Einstein doesn’t offer multivariable calculus. [/quote]

Rumor?  There are two engineering classes right now, both taught during the same period/same teacher (who is a good teacher and tries hard but its an impossible task).  There are no AP science classes at Einstein right now.  Things have changed a lot since your kids went to school.  Don't tell us we are lying when we have kids at the school.  Is it possible they get in, of course.  Does it make it harder when you don't have the same rigor, absolutely?  [/quote]

I still have a child at the school. It is disingenuous to say they don’t have AP science classes, because it’s an IB school and they have IB science classes. And you don’t have to have engineering classes in high school in my opinion.[/quote]

I just checked the test stats from OSA (office of shared accountability. Believe it or not, there is still somewhere in central office that talks about accountability). Einstein do not consistently offer IB HL math (missing 2022, 2023), IBL bio (missing 2021, 2024) and IB Physics (missing 2020, 2022) in the past 6 years. Not too bad as other local IB programs also miss data here or there. Springbrook and Watkins Mill seem to be most seriously seen missing offering IB courses in a consistent pattern. [/quote]

IB and AP aren't equal.  IB is very different.  Not al kids want AP.  Yes, you do need to do engineering if you want to major in it in college.  Your opinion is wrong.[/quote]

What are you talking about? Neither AP or IB curriculum offers engineering specifically. For college application, if they don't see an engineering class on your school's bulletin, they won't force your child to take an outside-of-school equivalent. Your kid is judged amongst their peers, i.e., other seniors at Einstein, not seniors from Blair or Wheaton. So if your kid is really interested in engineering track, he/she should take IB physics and/or IB chemistry/bio to demonstrate the interests and foundation.

I don't understand why HSs should offer both AP and IB. That could be too overwhelming, and honestly speaking, AP is slightly more rigorous, difficult and broader choices than IB in general sense. I really think we shouldn't have so many IB programs in the first place.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics