Reply to Britney Spears DUI last night

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Britney Spears DUI last night"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The vast majority of people with mental illness, including very serious mental illness, are not in conservatorships. Even rarer is a conservatorship in which the conservatee has significant income and assets and where the conservator requires the coservatee to generate millions in revenue.

Brittany is mentally ill. Only weirdos think otherwise. But being mentally ill, even significantly so, does not mean your right to make decisions about employment and medical care should be taken away. [/quote]
Your rose colored glasses need cleaning. People who think like you are responsible for the mentally ill homeless sleeping wherever they choose and not receiving proper care  [/quote]

Uh no. Brittany makes tons of money and is not homeless. She does make weird and poor choices. That does not meet the standard for being placed in a conservatorship. People who cannot care for themselves and are living on the streets typically do meet the standard for conservatorship. In Virginia, the standard is “gravely disabled” and unable to provide for one’s basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Brittany plainly does not meet this standard.[/quote]

you have zero way of knowing, based simply on insta posts, whether she meets the definition or not.[/quote]

I am extremely confident that unable to have house herself or provide food or shelter would be evident from tabloids and/or social media. [/quote]

Just because she has a roof over her head and food to eat doesn’t mean she doesn’t need a conservatorship. Stop enabling. Get real. [/quote]

It does if she’s able to provide it for herself.[/quote]

I know you want to hold on with an iron fist to the benchmark only being able to provide a home and food, but under California law there are more factors that can contribute to being deemed gravely disabled so either you’re ignorant, highly misinformed or disingenuous. I suspect you just plugged something into Chatgpt and posted it.

California law also carves out whether an individual is able to provide for their own personal safety. If someone is unable to safely exist in their community, or cause them serious bodily harm or they’re under severe mental disorder or substance abuse, they may be found to not be able to provide personal safety for themself

Britney may very well be there. [/quote]

Are you joking? California’s standard is MORE rigorous than Virginia’s (as is expected). There, conservatorship is considered a “last resort” and less restrictive alternatives need to have failed. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics