Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Alternative to ICE"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They need to overhaul the legal process. They need to structure it so it is open to all and not just people of higher means. The government needs to stop going after undocumented immigrants and start going after businesses. If you make it impossible to get work here, people will not come. They are coming to improve their lives and the lives of their children. Break the ability to earn money and they won’t come.[/quote] As an employer I am not allowed to question work documents even if I suspect they are fake. What can you go after the businesses for? You can’t say they knowingly hired an illegal immigrant if they’re not allowed to question if they are legal….. [/quote] E-Verify. It’s not perfect, but it will catch your obvious fakers. [/quote] Read the rules, if I get a mis match I can’t use that to deny the job. I still must hire them and give them the "opportunity to correct". How does that make sense?[/quote] I’m sorry what’s the issue here? Paperwork mistakes happen. They happened pre DOGE and they are certainly happening now. People shouldn’t lose jobs over it. Seems like a small inconvenience to make sure you are not hiring an illegal is preferable to hiring them and then watching them get disappeared the night before your biggest business day of the year. The fact that more employers don’t use it is telling. [/quote] The issue is even with an mis match I’m required to hire them. The start of this thread was "go after the business for hiring them". How can you go after the business for hiring them when I’m not allowed to deny or question them? You can’t have it both ways. If you don’t want someone to hire them, give that business the right to say no. [/quote] I’m missing the part where you’re required to hire them. You’re not allowed to take adverse action based on a potential mismatch. That doesn’t mean you have to hire them. You can decide you don’t like the way they talk to you, or they’ve countered for too much money, or they’re not responsive, or any number of reasons not prohibited by law. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics