Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Realignment for SEC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I actually think they will get takers. Associates will be voluntold to do it. Firms will brag to clients about their ability to influence the rules. I also disagree that being named in a rule release isn't a bit of a feather in one's cap. The CF director, for example, still talks about how he helped re-write Reg M-A.[/quote] Top 5 dumbest post of 2026. First, no associate detailee would or could significantly “influence” anything. Second, even if they did, no law firm would “brag” about it. Third, even if they did brag about it, no client would care. Fourth, any associate who a firm could so easily lose for 120 days has no future at the firm in any event (associates on partner track are indispensable to their cases/deals). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
