Reply to Nick Reiner’s lawyer quits. Why?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Nick Reiner’s lawyer quits. Why? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Alan Jackson is the sleaziest of the sleazy lawyers - he has lied to the court and conspired to spoil jury pools for his defense clients. He has no ethical core.

I have no doubt he wanted this case because he thought it would be very lucrative given Nick’s interest in his parent’s estate. My guess is that his older brother as executor refused to release funds to finance the defense of the brother who brutally murdered their parents. Nick will be barred from inheriting when he is convicted of the murders because California has a slayer statute.

Furthermore, Nick will be better represented by the very experienced and deeply dedicated career public defender Kimberly Greene who was assigned to his case. She is devoted to the defense of indigent defendants and undoubtedly has abundant experience with representing mentally ill and addicted clients. She also has the respect of her peers in ways that Alan Jackson doesn’t and never will.

Alan Jackson can be seen in several older episodes of Dateline, 48 Hours etc. because he was once a prosecutor who was allegedly avowed to be a prosecutor his entire career. He prosecuted Phil Spector among other high profile cases. He ran for the LA District Attorney job and lost to a female colleague, after which he whinged like a man child and quit to become a slimy low life type of defense attorney - the kind who worships the money, the win at any cost, and cares nothing for the integrity of the system and public confidence in the courts - something attorneys are ethically bound to promote and not attack. His hijinks in the case of Commonwealth v Karen Read were some of the scummiest I’ve seen in 45 years of following the law and 30 of them as a law student then lawyer myself - and a former defender and prosecutor.

Nick Reiner is better off with greedy amoral Jackson off the case. So is the general public, because Jackson would have made a spectacle and a farce of Reiner’s defense.[/quote][b]

‘His hijinks in the case of Commonwealth v Karen Read were some of the scummiest I’ve seen in 45 years of following the law and 30 of them as a law student then lawyer myself - and a former defender and prosecutor’[/b]

Can you explain? I only loosely followed that case. Was she acquitted? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics