Reply to Thomas Taylor and BCC

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Thomas Taylor and BCC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Exactly. Taking IB + Arts away from Einstein is just ridiculous. [/quote]

I don't know about arts, but Einstein can keep a local IB program if they want. But people here are often complaining that the IB program at Einstein means they can't take the higher-level AP classes they want, so it's not clear to me that that's the best option for Einstein.[/quote]

Currently, Einstein is under the Kennedy regional umbrella for IB.  That application program, though, doesn't draw nearly the way that B-CC's would, as B-CC's complementary advanced offerings are considered better, and it has considerably lower FARMS and EML rates than Kennedy.

This would tend to undermine Einstein's own local IB, reducing the population of advanced learners who, if they stayed, might help the school offer a broader array of IB classes, and at the higher level.  It struggles to maintain that, as it is.  Before the regional IB at Kennedy, Einstein was clearly the place to go within the DCC for that experience (it may still be, but to a lesser extent).  It drew sizeable numbers of IB students from the 5-school catchment -- some who did not get in to county-wide RMIB and some who preferred the more local (and less cutthroat) setting.  Changing demographics, overall, the slight shift toward Kennedy's regional program and a decision to stop offering advanced, IB-related courses in 9th & 10th (previously offering cohorting away from the base curriculum in some subjects) all have taken a toll.  With the school-choice consortia disappearing, taking away a huge catchment of those who might have chosen Einstein for its IB (open to all, unlike the application programs), in addition to BCC's greater draw away from the remaining local population, it looks as though MCPS's likely recommendations from the Program Analysis would create an untenable situation, leaving Einstein with little chance of providing the IB experience sought within the catchment.

That's from the perspective of Einstein's community.  From the perspective of the individual student, it's not as if B-CC's magnet program will be large enough to take all those applying from Einstein (and Northwood and Blair, the other two schools in the DCC heading into Region 1 that currently might access Einstein's IB through the choice process).[/quote]

Do most people in the DCC prefer Einstein to Kennedy for IB? Kennedy takes nearly all students -- only the vastly unqualified are rejected. I would think people would prefer Kennedy because they offer pre-IB classes.[/quote]

My kid got into Kennedy IB and chose Einstein because they offered both IB and strong arts. It feels very shady that now both of those are threatened by the proposed diminished enrollment at AEHS.[/quote]

[b]Northwood is getting a new building with great performing arts facilities so that makes sense[/b]. IB at BCC looks like a gift for BCC and Whitman. [/quote]

Then move VAC & Design to Northwood (maybe Communications, too, to better relieve Blair overcrowding without having to move SMCS) and put Humanities (changed to criteria-based), Medical Science/Healthcare and Languages at Einstein, shifting some of its catchment via the Boundary Studyvto Northwood or B-CC to keep enough room, shifting the Education magnet to Whitman to complement LaSJ/Public Service.

Or, as before, make Einstein the magnet IB.[/quote]

That hurts kids who want ap and a stronger curriculum.  And why should Einstein lose their signature programs which are the draw to Einstein.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics