Reply to Coverage of Gaza City Invasion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Coverage of Gaza City Invasion "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Op here. this thread is to discuss the state of coverage not to trade antisemitic and Islamophobic slurs.

Pls read and explain why this isn’t receiving more attention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-military-says-it-controls-40-gaza-city-plans-expand-operation-coming-2025-09-04/[/quote]

As noted earlier, none of this is newsworthy.  After Oct 7 it was obvious what would happen, and having it play out is just not "news" at this point.  There's nothing new to report - the hostages are still being held, Israel continues to work to locate them, and on it goes.  The occupation of Gaza is merely the end of an unremarkable and predictable consequence of Oct. 7.

The next newsworthy event will be the actual relocation of the Gazans far from Israel's borders, which will likely be of at least passing interest to the global media when it is completed.  Until then, there's nothing much new to report.  [/quote]

That is silly reply - on the cnn splash page right now is a dad who killed his kid’s abuser, a deadly crash in Spain of a tram, and 3 sisters who recreated a picture from the 80’s. [b]If those are newsworthy stories then the invasion of the largest city in Gaza should be a banner headline[/b] [/quote]

Not necessarily.[/quote]

Why was it a headline when Hamas invaded /occupied Israel and committed massacres?

Part of the reason Hamas did that in the first place was to gain attention because nobody cares when Israelis occupy them . It’s only when they kill Israelis, that the world cares[/quote]

That sure played out well for Hamas, didn't it?

People cared about Oct 7 because the civilized world disapproves of terrorism as a mechanism to try to achieve political ends.  That's not the sort of behavior civilized people want to see become any more frequent than it already is.  The predictable retaliation by Israel is interesting not because it happened, but because this time it is essentially unlimited - Israel clearly has had enough of small but deadly regular attacks and is taking measures to put an end to them once and for all.  That's the story, it's now well known, and it's not changing.  Ergo, nothing new to report.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics