Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Interesting standardized testing data from Princeton's freshmen survey"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is a spin-off post to this, so adding my comment here - look how much better legacy kids do on the SAT/ACT. [/quote] You mean kids whose parents are Ivy League educated do better on standardized tests? Wow, who would have thought?! I thought kids whose parents are poor, uneducated and lack resources would do better. :roll: [/quote] +1, basically every pro people talk about for legacy are just advantages of being wealthy. Legacy doesn’t need to exist.[/quote] The fundraising ROI for universities says otherwise. Sorry that you hate capitalism.[/quote] Great, show the proof that legacy admits of similar wealth status give more to the college then! I am not allergic to data.[/quote] This isn't a controlled study. Universities are effectively making strategic business decisions though admissions. And they think legacy admits will give more, whether there is data to support it or not. It's already well-established that yield is higher for legacies. https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-why-elite-colleges-cant-give-up-legacy-admissions/[/quote] It seems that you didn’t read this article, at least not closely. It almost entirely follows my argument and holds the limitation that it doesn’t hold conditional for the wealth of the person applying.[/quote] "A whopping 42 percent of legacy graduates were flagged as potential top donors, which could include their whole family. Only 6 percent of non-legacy graduates were flagged as potential top donors."[/quote] Once again that is not conditional for the wealth of the person applying. This is exactly my point. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics