Reply to When you can’t get into an Ivy +

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "When you can’t get into an Ivy +"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why don’t you just go to your state flagship, especially if it’s ranked in , say, the top 50? Tell me it makes no sense to pay all of that money for a private university that isn’t ranked in the top 15 or 20 when you could go to UVA, Michigan, North Carolina, maybe Florida, and obviously the UC schools?[/quote]

Well, [b]people that have instate Berkeley, UCLA,[/b] Michigan, Georgia Tech, and UT-Austin as options are in a wonderful place. And I suspect very few of those families can be persuaded to drop an additional $250,000 for undergrad at a different school.

But that's five schools out of 5000 colleges. There are a bazillion reasons why people choose something different than the state flagship. And for middle class families, the elite private schools are often cheaper than state flagships. Plus major strength, programs, vibe, network, opportunities, sports, location, community, weather, and on and on. [/quote]

Many people who have instate in CA go private if they can afford it. UCB and UCLA are great graduate schools and they can be good choices for many kids but any top UC comes with alot of compromises which limits their attractiveness to many.[/quote]

Please. If you’re in-state and get admitted to Berkeley or UCLA that’s where you’re going. UCLA is a dream for most California teens. [/quote]

are you an idiot? is that why the in state yield is only like 50%? [/quote]

DP. UCLA’s is 60%. UCB’s is 50%. These are already strong yields. Then factor in that some kids get into both and can’t choose both so they show up in one school’s yield but not the other. That means the two-school yield (i.e., they chose at least one of the two) is even higher. Maybe use that big brain of yours before calling people idiots.[/quote].

Cal is around 45%, UCLA around 52%, and for comparison, Michigan is around 42%.  UVA and UNC are low 40s as well, but UVA has had ED and UNC has EA.  These are strong yield rates for such large entering classes for schools with total enrollment over 20,000, only NYU betters them in the upper 50s and it uses ED to lock in students.

And, as noted, there are also CA students who get admitted to multiple UCs and choose another one over Cal and UCLA.[/quote]

Georgia Tech 46% in 2024-2025[/quote]

Like UVA, Tech gets the benefit of ED unlike Cal and UCLA[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics