Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Don’t Do it Harvard "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/7/27/harvard-trump-settlement-columbia/ The White House is pushing Harvard for a major financial settlement in negotiations to restore more than $2 billion in frozen funds, according to a person familiar with the talks — and demanding that Harvard cough up even more than Columbia University did earlier this week. United States President Donald Trump is personally pressing officials involved in the negotiations to ensure Harvard pays more than Columbia’s $220 million deal, the person said, adding that Trump believes exceeding that sum would set an example. The Trump administration has publicly framed the Columbia deal as a “template” for future settlements with elite universities like Harvard. Trump himself has zeroed in on Harvard because of a personal disdain for the University, according to the person, treating the school as a centerpiece in his broader campaign against higher education.[/quote] Wait til Trump does this to every other elite university in the country. Trump has legalized extortion, apparently.[/quote] First they came for Columbia And I did not speak out Because I was not a Columbia alum Then they came for Harvard And I did not speak out Because I was not a Harvard alum Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me[/quote] Imagine criminals write these in their jail cell. It’s funny.[/quote] It's actually a spin on a famous poem referring to people who refused to speak out against the Holocaust. People use it when they talk about how people refuse to speak out against wrongdoing because it doesn't affect them directly, and eventually the leopard does in fact bite their face.[/quote] You think I don’t know that? But when perpetrators say that, it makes it sound really funny.[/quote] Go call your nurse and have them give you your meds. Accusing those speaking out for academic freedom and against extortion of being perpetrators makes you sound insane. [/quote] Racial discrimination is academic freedom? You’re trying too hard to redefine the term.[/quote] You're very confused. No one--not even Trump--is threatening Harvard's funding over racial discrimination. You need to learn to read. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/21/us/trump-administration-harvard-hearing.html Judge Allison D. Burroughs did not issue a ruling during a crucial hearing, which lasted more than two hours in her courtroom in Boston. But she did seem receptive to Harvard’s arguments, as both the school and the government sought to have the case decided in their favor without a trial. The judge unleashed a barrage of pointed questions at the lone Justice Department lawyer. She demanded to know, for instance, how the administration could reasonably tie withdrawal of medical research funding to concerns about the civil rights of Jewish people. And she appeared bothered by the administration’s hurried approach to attacking Harvard’s research funding, suggesting there were potentially “staggering” constitutional consequences if the government could punish a university without due process. Monday’s hearing came two months after Harvard sued the Trump administration. In the lawsuit, Harvard accused the government of threatening the school’s First Amendment rights when it conditioned federal funding on the university bowing to a set of Trump administration demands. Beyond free speech concerns, a central question in the case is whether the Trump administration ignored rules and procedures when it blocked the funds. The administration framed its tactics as a righteous response to antisemitism. But Harvard and its allies saw the roster of federal demands as intrusions untethered from trying to eradicate discrimination.[/quote] I'm not understanding why Harvard is feeling so pressured to settle when they're going to win in court. Unless they think that it will be a never-ending barrage of nusiance cases from the Trump administration, and eventually Trump will get lucky with a judge who ignores a law (or a SCOTUS who does so).[/quote] Because they know they’re guilty.[/quote] Only according to people who don't follow the law.[/quote] Say whatever you want. It doesn’t make any difference.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics