Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "The most test optional-friendly schools - no penalty"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's such a shame that TO has inflated average test scores at most schools. It isn't just the 1550 kids who get screwed, since they'll submit test scores regardless. Its kids who get a 1450 (97% percentile), feel like failures, and are told they're below the school average so they shouldn't submit their scores (even though that average is based on 28% of kids).[/quote]' Agree, it makes it very hard to really decide where you fit and if you should submit your scores. DC is struggling with this. 1440 on SAT, 96th percentile nationally, and in the bottom 25% of students submitting scores to several schools they are interested in - so getting mixed advice on to submit or not. [/quote] DCUM doesn't talk about this very frequently. I am curious what would happen if you submit bottom 25% to a TO school. Isn't it better to submit? If you don't submit, aren't they going to just assume your score is far lower than 25%? For sure one would not submit 1200, 1300. [/quote] Really depends on the school and just how TO they are. My kid did not submit a 1490 (790 V 700M) to a [b]school that was TO prepandemic but loves super high scores if submitted[/b]. Would have been 25th percentile of admitted students but still a strong score. Extremely divisive decision on this board but it worked out. The TO haters could not get their heads around sitting on a 1490, but I think it depends on the school. [b]If a school says it’s TO, but most of their accepted students submit scores, the analysis is obviously different[/b]. Maybe you risk submitting at 25%. My kid was also able to put NM Commended on their application, which could have provided some additional comfort that the standardized testing was in a reasonable range. Ultimately, I think the question is does submitting the score help your overall profile. If you have all the other things (gpa, rigor, leadership, ECs, essays, recs, etc) and a score that is good but not at that level, why bother if the school is fine evaluating your kid without the score. Asking if they’ll assume your score is terrible if you don’t submit is just buying into the foolish notion that the SAT score is the most important data point in holistic admissions. That’s far from true at test required schools. [/quote] I think this is an isolated case not generally applicable to other applicants. Your DC has commended NM, that is equivalent to submitting a 1490, as another PP pointed out. Which true TO school loves super high score? If a school is true TO (Bowdoin), it will consider your score, but no true TO school would put [u]additional[/u] weight just because you have a "super high score (typically valued only by MIT Rice etc). I don't believe Bowdoin (or any of SWAP) would do that. Agree on the analysis for a school that says it’s TO, but most of their accepted students submit scores (Penn, Rice). [/quote] Ugh. No one is suggesting that this strategy should apply to everyone. I simply offered my family’s experience not submitting a high score that fell around the 25th percentile for that school and still finding success. That’s all I meant by loving high test scores. If [b]75% of admits who submitted scores have a 1500, the school likes high scorers[/b]. The point is weigh TO schools, the decision to submit is about the totality of the circumstances. I’m not going to debate if SLACs “really, really like high scores” the same way MIT does. Invoking MIT is rarely relevant in a broad based discussion about college admissions. [/quote] Only a handful of TO schools other than T5 can pull that off. WashU, Vandy, Northwestern, Chicago[/quote] Oh boy, sounds like we have another person who’s hates the idea of sitting on a 1490. That’s fine, but I would encourage you to look past the distro in a CDS to what the schools themselves say about SAT ranges for admitted students. CDSs show the ranges for matriculating students and those ranges are often pretty different. Again, just one small part of the analysis. [/quote] All I can find is the CDS data. Link to SAT range for admitted students?[/quote] I’m sure you can search admitted student or class profile on a college website. That said, one example (not the test case from above) is Amherst College which shows a slightly higher range for admitted students than matriculating students. Both 1500 or more at the 25th percentile BTW. Other schools’ spreads are greater. https://www.amherst.edu/about/facts/secondary_school_reports/class-of-2028-profile[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics