Reply to IU Kelley last minute switch up

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "IU Kelley last minute switch up"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's amazing how many people on this thread are calling kids stupid for nothing being able to get a 3.3 GPA when it has been repeatedly said that they must receive a B+ grade in every class - Kelley or not. [b][This is only for automatic admission, but kids can still get in.][/b]  That means 10 classes, as a freshman including the "weed out" ones, you can never get less than a B+. You can have a 3.9 GPA and not make it for one B in a 1 credit class.[b] [Extremely unlikely][/b]

Furthermore, you can assume that they are not going to do non-automatic admissions if they already went to such lengths as to enroll students under terms they knew they would not honor, weeks later.  [b][No you can’t. They will likely have fewer non-automatic admits but are still likely to take kids that barely miss (like your 3.9 example).][/b] They did it because they are out of room, but they knew that before May 1 and they did it anyway to trap the pre-business students at IU, [b][Conjecture. If they are out of room, why would the business school want to trap these students? And no one is trapped if they get the grades.][/b] having declined all other enrollments.

Meanwhile, the direct admits only have to get a 2.0 cumulative and can include any grade at or above a D-. [b][Wrong. You have to get a C or higher in the prereqs or you get started down the academic watch/alert/dismissal path.][/b] If this school is so elite and these direct admits are so clearly brilliant, why the polar opposite standards for performance?

There is absolutely legal precedent which prevents universities from doing what IU has done, [b][provide these precedents (I’m sure you can’t)] [/b] and I hope and expect that they will get sued. The standard admission agreement the kids enrolled with was "automated guaranteed admission with B or higher in every grade".  [b][As has been stated multiple times, they enrolled at IU, not Kelley.][/b] Check case law before saying there is no case [b][good advice, take it][/b]. It's a very expensive university [b][no it isn’t] [/b]and they did a very classic bait and switch with the hope of retaining some students in alternate majors by enrolling them under false pretense. [b][again, conjecture]  [/b]

Not a good look.

[/quote]

There were a lot of errors in your post, so I fixed it for you above.[/quote]

You spent a lot of effort to highlight what a tool you are.

Here is the Kelley cumulative requirements- https://bulletin.kelley.iu.edu/Undergrad/Policy/Detail?policyId=36&year=2024-2025 Requiring a C in certain core classes but a 2.0 overall.  Exactly what I said.

Admission to pre business at IU as you like to highlight held a guaranteed pathway to Kelley, so whether the admission was to IU/Kelley or IU is completely irrelevant.

Case Law
Implied Contract Theory: Zumbrun v. University of Southern California, 101 Cal.Rptr. 499 
Promissory Estoppel: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham County, 479 U.S. 130
Additional:
Doe v. Columbia University, 831
Mangla v. Brown University, 135
Connelly v. University of Vermont
Ross v. Creighton University, 957

I'm not going to even bother to factually discredit the rest of your nonsense or respond to any of your future posts. You are completely clueless.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics