Reply to Trump Says Trials for Migrants "Not Possible"

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump Says Trials for Migrants "Not Possible" "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am sorry I don't quite understand how can an illegal immigrant can be turned about away at the border with zero due process but somehow if they make it into the country there has to be due process in order to deport them? Outside of validating their status what else should we need to do?[/quote]

+100
And it's really such a shame the Biden administration saw fit to open the floodgates to millions of illegal immigrants in the first place.  Let's not forget who bussed them all over the country, often in the dead of night.  And now the Trump administration is left to clean up this disaster.[/quote]

Why do you keep repeating these lies? Biden complied with American and International law where asylum is concerned. He asked for and created bi-partisam legislation to deal with the issue more expediently and Trump got the GOP to reject their own legislation. Now he is using that same lack of judges to flaunt US and International law.

And people like you fall for it.[/quote]

CBP One App was not required under international law. Millions and millions.  It was treason.  I want to know who decided we should create a phone app to facilitate an invasion of unskilled, unvetted migrants?   That person should be tried for treason. Seriously. [/quote]

You know what, go ahead and accuse "that person" of treason. It is utterly nonsense and you will be laughed at and scolded for wasting people's time, but I applaud you for FINALLY using our existing legal channels. THAT IS ALL WE ARE ASKING. [/quote]

What was the purpose other than to destabilize America and facilitate her destruction?  As it was summarily stopped and deactivates as an App it was clearly not required by any law, so what was the point?  And who developed the App and implemented it?[/quote]

Let me repeat: I am for the Constitution and the rule of law. Are you??? Pick a lane.

[/quote]

Article 4 it is the Presidents job to control the borders from invasion.  An influx that overwhelms our civilian infrastructure to deal with such can only be construed as an invasion.[/quote]

You cannot pick and choose parts of the Constitution.

Whether or not the influx of immigrants in 2024 "overwhelmed the civilian infrastructure" is a complex question and extremely debatable: in some areas it did, in many many many others it did not. Is a delay in processing asylum requests "overwhelming the infrastructure"? If it is, it makes no sense to fire the judges who do it and thus overwhelm it more. Besides, we all know that many economists view immigration as a net positive for the U.S. economy, one that boosts the GDP and fills labor shortages. You just can't declare something an "invasion" willy-nilly. This is not done. We are not in Middle School.

Let's say the current administration puts together a team of experts that assesses the influx of migrants and decides it is a huge problem, that the negatives outweigh the positives. I may disagree but I have to accept because this is a democracy and he is the boss. I still have the right to protest peacefully and speak out, of course -- and I will -- but I accept.

We are more than willing to concede that the president address problems. LEGALLY. Following the rule of law. Respecting the Constitution.

I do not accept violating the Constitution I am just going to keep repeating it: I am for the Cosntirution. I am for the rule of law. ARE YOU???[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics