Reply to Pervasive Myths - set the record straight

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Pervasive Myths - set the record straight"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]that northeastern gamed the system for rankings [/quote]

But that’s not a myth.  It’s actually true.  Took about 2 decades but they did it.[/quote]

You can call it gaming, but Northeastern looked at the formula and sought to improve where they could.  [b]A myth would be that no other schools did the same thing.[/b]  They might not have been as effective, but so many have.  Schools took steps to lower admission rate when it was a factor (by inducing applications through push marketing), class size (through registration cutoffs), student faculty (by counting faculty that are peripheral to undergraduate education), same with resources (counting resources in IPEDS, the government database used by USNWR, that are peripheral to undergraduate education), improving alumni giving rate when it was a factor by dropping alumni from the database to lower the denominator (I think Berkeley was caught doing this), influencing other voters like it is Eurovision, admitting students that don't count against stats (foreign, Spring, etc.).  There is literally no factor on USNWR that could not be "gamed" to some extent.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics