Reply to STATS ON PLAYTIME OF FORMER Capital players in College?

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "STATS ON PLAYTIME OF FORMER Capital players in College?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]The relative lack of success of Capital players at the college level is partly the result of Capital's "fair play" system.   Dominant players get approximately the same playing time as less dominant players.  That helps with the development and recruiting of the less dominant players.  In other clubs the less dominant player would not get as much time or development.  But, that system can also hurt the team (through less wins) and the more dominant players b.c the more dominate player might not get as much playing time or accolades, which can impact player rankings etc.   Those player rankings then impact allocated scholarship money, and consequently playing opportunities at the college level.  It only makes sense for college coaches to give more playing opportunities to the players with the higher scholarship amounts.  As Capital's recruiting success bears out, the fair play system works very well at getting significant numbers of commits to D1 program.  Its not as great at allowing the most dominate players to shine as brightly (as compared to other clubs) which can lead to more buzz, higher rankings, scholarships & consequently college opportunities.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics