Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "REAL ID and MAGA"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]And another: "The California DMV denied me a Real ID today because I am not a homeowner. Sounds weird, right? Let me explain. To get a Real ID you have to prove where you live. Fair enough. I brought my rental lease, which was listed as a valid document. Although it stated my name and physical address, that wasn't good enough. I also brought my contract with the United States Postal Service, which has my physical address on file, stating my mailbox number and address. Even though the name exactly matched my ID on both the post office contract and the rental agreement, this still wasn't good enough. Because I live in an area considered "rural" by the post office, I cannot have mail delivered directly to my home. Instead, I must use the post office. The DMV said that federal law requires people to have documentation verifying BOTH their physical address AND post office box on ONE document. The only documents that satisfy this requirement are utility bills. Many tenants, like me, don't pay utility bills directly. Only my landlord gets utility bills. So I was denied a Real ID because I live in a rural area and am not a homeowner. As an American citizen, I am quite concerned about this. I have an apartment, which means I'm doing better than a lot of people. Should housing status be used to determine whether you can get an ID? Is that Constitutional? Should it be?" [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics