Reply to Lucy Calkins alarmists

Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids

Reply to "Lucy Calkins alarmists"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]While there are many flaws with Lucy’s curriculum, there are three positives that I’m concerned are going to the wayside with the science of reading movement.

1. Opportunity to read books. CKLA is generally strong and research-based. However, with this and similar curriculums, there isn’t necessarily space for kids to read for enjoyment at school. Classroom libraries (even organized by genre/topic) are being eliminated. I’ve seen this have negative impacts, especially in grades 3 and onward, on students’ engagement and creating a community of readers.

2. Lucy emphasizes interactive read aloud, which research shows is important even with middle and high school students. It builds vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, and not to mention, provides an opportunity to incorporate community and character building. This goes to the wayside with passages on passages.

3. Less focus on writing. Many schools have a narrow view of the science of reading, which has minimized writing. Students need to write for many purposes and audiences. Writing workshop carves out time for writing (not handwriting, that needs to be taught separately and systematically). [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics