Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "T20 or T5 lacs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What are the T5 Lacs?[/quote] in no particular order swarthmore williams bowdoin pomona amherst wellesley yes, there are 6 not 5[/quote] There are 5, Bowdoin should be taken off the list.[/quote] Bowdoin is currently outranking Pomona and Wellesley.[/quote] Why stop at 5 or 6. Middlebury, Hamilton, Wesleyan, Colby and Bates are strong too. Enough of the ranking -- let your kid pick the school where they feel comfortable and it will be great.[/quote] I agree, and why stop there? As I posted much earlier There are 9 SLACs with with SAT medians above 1500 Amherst Bowdoin Claremont McKenna Harvey Mudd Middlebury Pomona Swarthmore Wellesley Williams and another cluster right behind them (1480+) Carleton Colgate Davidson Hamilton Haverford Vassar Washington & Lee Academically their student bodies are indistinguishable. Wesleyan Bates Colby Smith Grinnell are all great schools with only slightly lower SAT averages. 26 well resourced schools all with excellent students. The idea that one can objectively stack rank them is frankly foolish. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics