Reply to Why the MAHA obsession with chemicals in food, but not the environment?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why the MAHA obsession with chemicals in food, but not the environment?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/17/climate/trump-eliminates-epa-science.html

What does EPA science look at? Things like PFAs in our drinking water causing cancer, infertility and more, the impact of pesticide runoff contamination on food and water, impact of airborne pollution on health, and more.

But hey, if you don't have a separate entity to research and report this data, you can feign ignorance, and when responsibility for researching and reporting this data shifts to the industry who seek to make money over health, it's lose lose for all of us.

To be clear to the MAGAs who I know are in this forum, Trump's actions at the EPA fly in direct opposition to his campaign platform to Make America Healthy and YOU, yes, YOU MAGAS, are going to be more sick, more influenced by chemicals because of how you voted. If you thought you were removing big industry because of RFK, well RFK is not involved in EPA and policies at EPA are in direct opposition to RFK's platforms.

If you're actually paying attention, you'd realize that RFK is frankly being utilized as a distraction while our health is ruined with far more serious action at the EPA and chemicals that will proliferate in our US grown foods.

I don't believe Democrats are adequate on certain things like PFAs, but they are far better than the nightmare we have now implemented. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics