Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Patent Office RTO Predictions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Email from POPA says examiners are safe to continue work from home. [/quote] But supervisors are screwed?[/quote] Supervisors and anyone non-bargaining, like OGC, OCFO, etc. Yes, we're screwed. And we take zero appropriated funds. So you're saving exactly nothing by doing this and if/when people leave.[/quote] +1 Most Americans don't know that USPTO is fully funded by fees for patents and trademarks. No tax dollars, at all. This is going to have a disastrous impact on American IP even if it's non-bargaining employees required to RTO. It's hard enough to recruit talent leaders in any position. Think about IT and cybersecurity positions.[/quote] Pretty sure Leon plans to RIF most feds anyway and replace them with AI. PTO examiners who stare at computers all day reviewing seem like a prime target for AI replacement. [/quote] That would be a hell of an AI system[/quote] I wonder what sort of nonsense an AI examiner would hallucinate? As a patent practitioner, at least I might find it amusing appealing something like that.[/quote] It would certainly make for interesting work for us on the ex parte appeals. A reasonable case could be made that we should move to a system where you have to request examination, and that you would have to do so before bringing suit under the patent. That would me that only commercially important patents would be examined, and would hopefully result in more thorough examinations, as the Examiners would have (much) more time to search and examine each case on their docket. But that - in a normal world at least - would require legislative change. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics