Reply to When you say t50...

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "When you say t50..."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]T50 using USNWR 2018 - pre TO, pre pandemic, and not the current methodology that places mobility over academics. To be clear I do not disagree with the institutional policies that promote social mobility, I just disagree that it should be part of ranking methodology. [/quote]

2018?

Nope.[/quote]

NP. Why? I agree that 2018/2019 was right around the time that common sense ended. Anything from that time or prior is a useful instrument for ascertaining actual quality of the education

[/quote]

2018/2019 is the proper vintage? Wouldn't that be an actual snapshot from 2018/2019?  I understand that you like the criteria from that era but it's out of date at this point. Meaning 2018 criteria has 2018 or older data? [/quote]

I prefer the criteria applied from 1960 to 2022. I do not value an increase in poor students. I am much more interested in things like instruction, outcomes, caliber of peers, class sizes and number of classes  taught by professors versus other students.

You can feel free to value other things
[/quote]

I value the most up to date information when making a decision.  How do you plug in the current information into the old criteria? I think you just really like the actual rankings of a certain vintage because you like where the schools are ranked. Do you use old maps even though they might not be accurate?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics