Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Who has changed their minds about religion on this forum?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Any normal, rational person with any critical thinking skills is atheist[/b], I think what some of you are objecting to is those who are anti-theist. I don’t like them either — unless they can make the case what harm does religious belief do?[/quote] Thank you for this example of judgemental atheists on this forum. I know plenty of "normal, rational" people who are not atheist. There's so much black-and-white and Evangelical-Christian-focused on this forum. [/quote] Are they rational when it comes to the question of the supernatural? Please demonstrate the evidence for that claim you are making.[/quote] I can't prove God's existence, but God's existence isn't disproven either. So it's not irrational to believe in God anymore than it's irrational to declare definitively that God doesn't exist. Your claim might be more defensible if you were talking about agnostics. But, regardless, there are many reasons beyond belief in God that someone might be religious - community, values, meaning/purpose, etc.[/quote] It is irrational to make a claim for which there is no supporting evidence. That is essentially the DEFINITION of "irrational".[/quote] Actually, the definition of irrational is: "not rational: such as a (1) : lacking usual or normal mental clarity or coherence (2) : not endowed with reason or understanding b: not governed by or according to reason" Plenty of religious people have perfectly fine mental clarity and coherence. The world is not black and white. People are complex. Insisting that anyone who is religious must therefore lack critical thinking skills is ignorant and reductionist. It's this kind of atheist mindset all over this forum that paints all atheists as narrow-minded and angry. Which is not to say that there aren't angry, narrow-minded religious folks on here as well. Mostly, to get back to OP's point, people on this forum too often paint with a broad brush in ways that only showcase their own ignorance of others and of human nature in general. There is rarely compassionate, open discussion on here. It's always "gotcha" comments and accusations. The internet isn't really built for compassionate, open dialogue; it's so much easier to just be nasty to each other.[/quote] “Not endowed with reason or understanding”. Your post proves my point, that it is irrational. Thank you![/quote] I feel like we're not speaking the same language, or you're purposely ignoring me when I say that people are complex and that belief in God who isn't proved or disproved doesn't negate their ability to be reasonable, understanding, rational people. Do you not hold space for people to be more than one thing? Or do we all just have room to be one-dimensional?[/quote] 1. “Rational” and “irrational” are an exact dichotomy. 2. Belief in the supernatural is irrational because even the most strident admit there is scant actual evidence for it. 3. Therefore anyone who believes in the supernatural is irrational, on that subject anyway. What part of that do you disagree with? 1, 2, 3, or more?[/quote] I have asked (upstream) what evidence for the supernatural would be acceptable and was met with silence, so I’ll ask again.[/quote] [b]I have no idea what would be acceptable[/b], and if there is no supernatural than the very question is preposterous. You are making the claim there is one, so show evidence, or admit it is an irrational belief by the definition you posted.[/quote] Then how can someone provide evidence if you don’t know what you’re looking for? I’ve dropped a couple of clues (the existence of other minds, the existence of human rights) of things we accept as true but can’t be proven rationally. Care to take a stab?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics