Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Diet, Nutrition & Weight Loss
Reply to "When are the compounded weight loss drugs going away? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not going away. [b]Trump's new head of FDA and lawsuit will keep compounding in business for the foreseeable future [/b]. I would assume insurance and drug manufacturers will figure out how to make the named drugs more accessible and cheaper with the pressure. If not the compounders will keep stealing their business. [/quote] Please tell me you are joking. Of course he won’t. [/quote] Not joking. Do you know who the nominee is? [/quote] Anti COVID vaxx JHU dude. [/quote] He is a transplant surgeon and exec at Sesame. [b]All in on compounds.[/b] Now with Elon on injections-- here to stay. [/quote] You can't be "all in on compounds." There is such a thing as patent law in the US. Full stop. Do you have any idea how much power Pharma has in the US, anyway?[/quote] Big pharma is really worried right now. FDA makes the designation which allows compounders to thrive. It is fun to watch Lily try to compete with them now. [/quote] It starts at the FDA, when they put a drug on the shortage list. But it doesn’t end there. Patent protections are in the statutes, which does allow compounding during shortages. But, if they are on the list and not actually in shortage, then drug companies file in federal Court. And [b]if it gets to SCOTUS, they are ideologically conservative,[/b] which makes them more likely to uphold patent law and let the free market do its thing. Trumps justices would vote against carving out an exception to patent law for GLP-1s, because there is nothing in the plain language of the statute that allows it absent an actual shortage. [/quote] SCOTUS won't even take this. The drug is on patent. There is no gray area here. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics