Reply to Would you have a first baby at age 50 or 51? Assume a surrogate and $ but not a lot of

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Would you have a first baby at age 50 or 51? Assume a surrogate and $ but not a lot of "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I had my only at 46. Its not any more tiring now then it would have been 15 years ago. having kids is a challenge no matter the age of the parents.[/quote]

If you seriously think you have the same energy level for a child at 46 that you had at 29 then you’re delusional.

[/quote]

not delusional. I was working like crazy, depressed, weak and skinny as a rail at 29. I'm much healthier physically and emotionally now than I was then. [/quote]

The fallacy of the sample of 1. Of course, a sick 29 year old might have more energy than a very healthy 46 year old. But overwhelmingly a 29 year old woman is going to be healthier and have more energy than a 46 year old. [/quote]

But every single person trying to make this decision knows a lot more about their own health and energy than you do. Nobody makes this decision without knowing those things.

What’s getting left out to me here is that the younger partner is 43. Tons of people have kids at 43. It’s really not a big deal. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics