Reply to Would you have a first baby at age 50 or 51? Assume a surrogate and $ but not a lot of

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Would you have a first baby at age 50 or 51? Assume a surrogate and $ but not a lot of "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I had my only at 46. Its not any more tiring now then it would have been 15 years ago. having kids is a challenge no matter the age of the parents.[/quote]

If you seriously think you have the same energy level for a child at 46 that you had at 29 then you’re delusional.

[/quote]

not delusional. I was working like crazy, depressed, weak and skinny as a rail at 29. I'm much healthier physically and emotionally now than I was then. [/quote]

The fallacy of the sample of 1. Of course, a sick 29 year old might have more energy than a very healthy 46 year old. But overwhelmingly a 29 year old woman is going to be healthier and have more energy than a 46 year old. [/quote]

The question is not energy when you’re 46, but when you’re 56 with a 10 year old and 63 with a 17 year old. Some people do have that kind of energy and others don’t. 
And having a baby at 50? No, you’re going to be 75 and possibly needing assisted living when the kid is trying to start their career/ get married.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics