Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Diet, Nutrition & Weight Loss
Reply to "Losing weight: the difference in treatment is profound "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My husband treats me differently at a size 2 than a size 6. He always wants sex, but the power dynamic shifts in my favor at a smaller size. He's more attentive, deferential and available. [/quote] Interesting. Majority of men would prefer a size 6 over a size 2[/quote] There is literally no difference, have you checked waist measurement between size 2 pants and size 6 pants? 5 inch tops.[/quote] As someone who went from size 2 to 6 and was shocked by how much attention I received, I say that the other PP is right and you are wrong.[/quote] It depends on how you carry your weight. I am normally a very fit size 2 and get plenty of attention at that size. At size 6 I get pudgy around the midsection and rarely noticed. [/quote] +1 Pear/hourglass shapes have more flexibility. They can still look attractive with an extra 10-20 lbs. Moreso than apple/inverted shapes.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
