Reply to The problem with Desmond Tutu’s quote:

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "The problem with Desmond Tutu’s quote:"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am so glad that there are still people in this world who can see and determine for themselves that some things are clearly unjust and need to stop. In this age of whataboutism and people with no moral compass, I can see why OP is struggling with Tutu's quote.

1) was the holocaust something we should have stopped OP? 
2) was slavery something that should have been abolished?
3) if you see a man, beating his wife and her unable to defend herself because he is twice her size, do you ask yourself what she did to provoke him? [/quote]

This is exactly the simplistic moralizing that causes people like OP to not want to engage with you. [/quote]

Simplistic moralizing? Explain EXACTLY what you mean by that and what should have been done instead in each example.[/quote]

EXACTLY what I mean is that those examples are clearly wrong, but there are many examples that people will assertively tell you are [i]omg just like[/i] the Holocaust, slavery, apartheid, abuse, etc.

And they either are not the same at all or at least aren’t clearly so. And arguing with people who have a, yes, simplistic view is exhausting and annoying and I can see why someone would want to avoid doing it and thus avoid “picking a side” and then be accused of “siding with the oppressors!!” for refusing to validate histrionic oversimplifications.
[/quote]

So then list some of those ambiguous examples instead of telling me how wrong I am for pointing out that there are times in history when it's clear as day. That is what Tutu was talking about.

It is not my fault you have no moral compass and gumption and can't or won't discern when something is clearly wrong. I am tired of people who are puposefuly obtuse and want to "both sides" everything." Sure, sometimes, perhaps even lots of the time things are not black and white. But that's not what Tutu was talking about so stop hiding behind phrases like "simplistic moralizing."[/quote]

Friend, no one is saying that there is [i]no[/i] such thing as clearcut moral situations ever. But no, I sure am not going to trot out examples so you can explain to me how in your opinion this ambiguous example is not in fact ambiguous, which you had insight into because you have drunk the Righteousness Juice.

If you are one of these charming people who harangue those who tell you they are not taking sides on a particular issue, you might want to check yourself. Accept that not everyone is open to hearing your message, and that not everyone is going to agree with you, and no one owes you discussion. If someone says “I am neutral on this issue” then respect them and don’t talk to them about it.

And if you are convinced in your bones that whatever is OMG [i]just like[/i] apartheid/the Holocaust/slavery etc then I’m sure you can find plenty of validation by people who will exactly agree with you. And this is maybe why nobody outside that bubble wants to talk to you. [/quote]

You are just prattling on because you have no moral compass and get triggered when people bring up clear examples of what Tutu was talking about. I didn't bring up situations that were unclear. I brought up clear-cut examples and that is what you objected to and called "simplistic moralizing." There are times in history (and yes, current events) that call for us to take action and not turn our heads the other way. By choosing to ignore the injustice, we are allowing it to continue to exist. The fact that you got offended by Tutu's quote is very telling of the kind of person you are: a coward.
[/quote]

Pray tell, what actions are you taking on what issues, exactly?[/quote]

Listen, moron, I am a genocide survivor. I hate to mention it because idiots like you will demean it and minimize it. It was clear-cut in 1995 when over 8000 men and boys were slaughtered in Srebrenica that the world should intervene and stop the atrocities. I'm glad that people who are better than you had the gumption and the empathy to save my life and lives of many others.  [/quote]

Yes, diplomats and people in the military did that work. What do/did you want from the rest of us?[/quote]

Just be a decent human and not call it simplistic moralizing when some of us get involved to stop what is clearly wrong. Is that too much to ask?[/quote]

Nobody on this thread has said that you shouldn’t get involved to stop what you see as clearly wrong. Nobody.

This thread is about deciding that other people are (per the quote) either with you or against you, and saying that those who are not vocally aligned with your cause are supporting injustice.

That’s a statement that you can get away with if you’re Desmond Tutu, but one most fairly uninformed activists are in no position at all to be making.  [/quote]

But who are you to decide who is an informed activist and what their motivations are? Protests happen for all sort of reasons, if that's what you're talking about. People have a right to their opinions even if it's something you decide is ineffective or worthless. You would never know what I've been through or what motivates me if you just met me.

Lastly, we are talking about Desmond Tutu and what he meant by his words. He was speaking on behalf of his people. He had a big platform and used it. Not everyone who sees the injustice and wants to do something to change it is able to do it in the same way.[/quote]

DP. Further, not everyone sees every issue as injustice or justice. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics