Reply to US Marshalls told not to follow court orders but to heed US Attorney General

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "US Marshalls told not to follow court orders but to heed US Attorney General"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is a press release from some lawyers, saying that CBP was refusing service of the court orders, and so were the US Marshals.

https://mobile.twitter.com/rotophonic/status/826535098623225857[/quote]

Yup, this very dangerous movement is already under way. Even more reason for Democrats to resist the new SC nomination and keep the current make-up as long as possible. It also explains why Trump is pushing the GOP Senate wants to remove Nuclear Option as quickly as possible.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2017/01/30/hidden-danger-of-trump-immigration-orders-dismissal-of-court-orders/#2b023832cf4f

http://www.salon.com/2017/01/31/trumps-muslim-ban-could-provoke-a-constitutional-crisis-will-the-executive-branch-ignore-the-courts/[/quote]p

This is extremely dangerous. No SC hearings until the tax returns are released and the executive branch heeds the judicial. We can't go on as if this is business as usual.[/quote]

Here's an article on "judicial reform" by tossing out Marbury. This seems to be bubbling up in conservative legal circles:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/12/6th-circuit-transgenderism-is-settled-law

[/quote]

omg[/quote]

They expect Gorsuch to spearhead gutting Chevron deference.  Conservative judicial activism on the march.  [/quote]

Nice prediction here. It took 7 years, but they didn't take the eye off the ball. The Chevron conversation in this thread is amusing in hindsight. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics