Reply to Why didn't WUSTL make the Forbes new Ivy list?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Why didn't WUSTL make the Forbes new Ivy list?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Stop pumping up an IVY safety. It is not good.  And there is no such thing as new Ivy.  There are 8 Ivies and Stanford, MIT, Cal Tech.  Duke is right below.  Chicago there too.  Nothing else is worth what is approaching 100k a year.  And for publics, only michigan, Cal, UVA, and now UCLA are really worth it.  There are only a handful of SLACs worth it. Amherst, Williams, Pomona, Swarthmore, Barnard (only because of Columbia association).  [/quote]

The ivies are not a single entity. Stanford, MIT, Caltech, and Duke are better than half the ivies. Similarly, a school like Rice or Vanderbilt could be seen as a peer to lower ivies like Dartmouth or Cornell.[/quote]

Nah[/quote]

I don't think that you understand the new realities... talented kids who would have been at the Ivies a short time ago are now at other schools, [b]since many spots are going to international students, children of migrant workers and homeless individuals, etc.[/b]  They must choose elsewhere and the caliber of a number of schools has risen in comparison to the Ivies.  It is the same with faculty.  Top schools are desperate to diversity their faculty, yet by far the majority of people graduating with PhDs are white, so those smart white graduates have to go somewhere.  A new landscape...[/quote]

What is really happening is the expressway for white, upper middle class kids has ended and now the student bodies will look more like a cross section of the USA.

If you have a problem with that, that is a you problem. No one is guaranteed a spot at an Ivy and the idea that white upper middle class parents are upset about it is quite a tell.[/quote]

If this were the case, these schools would be 65% white and include substantial rural blocs. Instead, they are max 35% white undergrad and trending downward. The goal is to look like a UN or WEF symposium, unfortunately. [/quote]

More racist trolling. This site is not the KKK college forum. Go spew this nonsense and lies elsewhere. Fight for white rights type of a guy you are.  Asians students are out performing white and other non white students which is why Asians are over represented at the top schools compared to their population size here in the states. Resulting, whites and other non white groups are underrepresented.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics