Reply to the case for not divorcing

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "the case for not divorcing"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why didn’t you drive her OP?

Personally I think remarrying and having babies when you have young kids is pretty tacky so I’m with you there. [/quote]

Same. So trashy. [/quote]

Quick, everyone stop living your lives because two losers on DCUM think it's "tacky and trashy."

BTW tacky and trashy are words you use when you're uneducated and haven't read enough to learn other, more descriptive words. [/quote]

NP with a PHD. I agree. It’s both trashy and tacky. [/quote]

Tacky is an attempt at [i]argumentum ab auctoritate[/i] by citing your ([i]sic[/i]) "PHD" instead of letting your ideas stand and fall on their merits.[/quote]

It was entirely relevant since the previous poster said the previous PP’s conclusion implied lack of education.  The PhD poster then showed that it’s possible to be very educated and make the same conclusion.

But you knew all that, didn’t you? You just wanted to sound clever.

—New NP also with a PhD[/quote]

It does indeed show a lack of education when all you can do is resort to personal attacks and not properly explain why you disagree with certain behaviors. I don't believe for a second that either of you have a PhD.[/quote]

I explained why your post was disingenuous. As for you not believing me—oh well.[/quote]

No, you didn't. And no, I don't believe that you have a PhD. If anything, you'd be able to communicate better. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics